The Legislation That Passed… But Didn’t !

By: Tommy Simpson, Director
     Organizational Services, West Region
     Southern States Police Benevolent Assoc.

 

 

Senate Bill 2084
Municipal Officer’s Due Process Bill Dies on House Calendar


The credit for this bill not becoming law in the 2006 legislative session can be given dominantly to Representative Mark Baker of Rankin County. This bill was introduced in the Senate by Senator Gray Tollison of Oxford, Ms at the request of PBA.

Law enforcement officers across this state, especially those in Rankin County have a right to know how all of this came about and why this legislation did not pass. Legal or not, it is a classic example of “POLITICS AS USUAL”, not democracy. It is nothing less than shameful when an state representative uses the House rules to kill legislation which has already passed by an over whelming majority vote of his own colleagues. It is also a typical example of the abuse of power which creates the need for this legislation in the first place. I can and do respect Representative Baker’s opinion and personal vote on the due process issue, but I do not respect his tactics.

Senate bill 2084 passed the Senate, with unanimous vote. It was then sent to the House for consideration and assigned to the House Municipalities Committee. It was amended by the committee and recommended for passage by the House. The most significant change made by the House committee amendment was to allow municipalities to placed officers on leave with or without pay until disposition of the hearing. Since cities without civil service that choose to do this are already doing so, the bill was still worthy of our support.

When the bill was called to a vote of all members of the House of Representatives it passed by a vote of 113 yea to 6 nay. After the vote, one of the six representatives voting against the bill, Representative Mark Baker filed a motion to reconsider. His motion caused the bill to be placed back on the House calendar for reconsideration. When the bill was not called for reconsideration before the House deadline, the bill died making Representative Baker’s actions to stop its passage successful.

It is worthy of remembrance that Senate bill 2084 passed the Senate by a unanimous vote of the 51 Senators present. Of the 119 House members present and voting on this bill only 6 voted against it. So of the total 170 members of the Mississippi Legislature voting on this bill, the following 6 were the only ones who voted against it.

Representative Mark Baker District 74 Rankin and Madison Counties
Representative John Moore District 60 Rankin and Simpson Counties
Representative John Reeves District 71 Rankin and Hinds Counties
Representative Mark Formby District 108 Pearl River County
Representative Jeffery Smith District 39 Lowndes County
Representative Clayton Smith District 59 Rankin County

The amended version of the bill would have mandated municipalities to adopt policies which provide these basic due process procedures for law enforcement officers in administrative actions involving suspension without pay or termination. Procedures required by the bill were;

  • The officer be notified in writing of a proposed suspension without pay or termination, the reason for such action and their right to appeal such action within 5 days.
  • Upon filing appeal, be provided a fair and impartial hearing.
  • Have a right to be represented by legal counsel at his/her own expense.
  • Have a right to question witnesses who testify against them.